TX STATETexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
2000

Aiken v. State

36 S.W.3d 131Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) • Decided 2000Voided
RetentionLien RightsCited 39 times

HOLDING

A contractor was convicted of misapplying fiduciary property for failing to pay subcontractors, but the Texas Court of Appeals reversed the conviction. The court ruled the prosecution failed to prove that the contractor's non-payment created substantial risk of loss to the owners, since the owners' liability was protected by a 10% statutory retainage fund. This decision protects subcontractors by clarifying that retainage funds exist specifically to cover unpaid subcontractor claims.

KEY FINDINGS

Retention

Retainage funds (typically 10%) are legally designated to protect subcontractors if the general contractor fails to pay them—don't assume you're unsecured.

Lien Rights

If a contractor doesn't pay you, the owner's retainage obligation is separate from the contractor's criminal liability, giving you a direct claim against held funds.

FULL COURT OPINION