Benge General Contracting, LLC and James Benge v. Hertz Electric, LLC and HTJ Global Electric, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) | 2021

reversed in part, affirmed in partCited 0 timesSTANDARDTexas
View on Court Website

What This Case Means for Subcontractors

Benge General Contracting hired Hertz Electric and HTJ Global Electric for electrical work on commercial sites. A dispute arose over contract scope and performance. The trial court awarded attorney's fees against the electrical contractors, but the appeals court reversed that decision, ruling that Texas law only allows attorney's fees against individuals and corporations—not limited liability companies (LLCs). The court affirmed all other damages and findings.

Key Takeaways

  • If you're sued as an LLC, the other party cannot recover attorney's fees under Texas Section 38.001, even if they win. This protection doesn't apply to sole proprietors or corporations.
  • Get written approval on contract scope before starting work. Benge stamped acceptance terms on bids, but disputes still arose over what was included versus excluded.
  • Lien waivers and change orders matter. Document every scope change in writing to avoid disputes over what work was actually required under the original bid.

Trial court abused discretion in awarding attorney's fees against LLC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas), 2021

Frequently Asked Question

Can I be forced to pay the other contractor's attorney's fees if I lose a contract dispute?

It depends on your business structure. If you operate as an LLC, Texas law does not allow attorney's fees to be awarded against you. However, if you're a sole proprietor or corporation, you could be liable. Always structure your business carefully and document all contract terms and changes in writing.

Related Cases

Gall v. United States

2007enforced

Appellate courts must review all sentences under an abuse-of-discretion standard regardless of whether they fall inside or outside the Guidelines range, and cannot require extraordinary circumstances to justify sentences outside the range.

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davy

2002voided

Sovereign immunity bars a contractor's breach-of-contract suit against a state agency absent express legislative consent; neither the agency's conduct, contract terms, nor general statutes waive immunity from suit.

Piotrowski v. City of Houston

2001reversed

Municipal liability under § 1983 requires proof of official policy as the moving force; isolated employee misconduct insufficient, and equal protection claim time-barred.

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena

1995remanded

Federal race-based classifications must be analyzed under strict scrutiny regardless of whether they benefit or burden minorities, and the Fifth Amendment's equal protection obligation equals the Fourteenth Amendment's.

Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville

1993remanded

An association of contractors has standing to challenge a minority set-aside ordinance without proving any member would have won a contract absent the ordinance; the injury is denial of equal competitive opportunity, not loss of a specific contract.

Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

2004enforced

A contractor must exhaust administrative remedies established by a regional transportation authority before pursuing breach of contract claims in court, even when the authority lacks governmental immunity from suit.