Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.

679 S.E.2d 223 | West Virginia Supreme Court | 2008

remandedCited 10 timesSTANDARDTexas
View on Court Website

Holding Summary

Forum-selection clauses in commercial contracts are enforceable when reasonably communicated, mandatory in language, applicable to the claims and parties involved, and not shown to be unreasonable or unjust; the circuit court erred in denying defendant's motion to dismiss based on the forum-selection clause in the coal supply agreement.

All actions brought in connection with this Agreement shall be filed in and decided by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Virginia.

West Virginia Supreme Court, 2008

Related Cases

Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.

2013reversed

Forum-selection clauses in federal contracts are enforced through §1404(a) transfer motions, not §1406(a) dismissals, and must be given controlling weight except in exceptional circumstances.

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davy

2002voided

Sovereign immunity bars a contractor's breach-of-contract suit against a state agency absent express legislative consent; neither the agency's conduct, contract terms, nor general statutes waive immunity from suit.

Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

2004enforced

A contractor must exhaust administrative remedies established by a regional transportation authority before pursuing breach of contract claims in court, even when the authority lacks governmental immunity from suit.

General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.

2001voided

The State does not waive sovereign immunity from breach-of-contract suits by accepting contract benefits; Chapter 2260's administrative procedure is the exclusive remedy for such claims.

United States v. Winstar Corp.

1996enforced

The Government's contractual promises regarding supervisory goodwill accounting treatment are enforceable despite subsequent regulatory changes, and the Government is liable for breach when Congress eliminated those accounting benefits.

Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase

1992enforced

An arbitrator's decision is generally not reviewable for errors of fact or law, with limited exceptions for fraud, corruption, exceeding powers, or procedural unfairness.