TN STATETennessee Supreme Court
1999

Frizzell Construction Co. v. Gatlinburg, L.L.C.

9 S.W.3d 79Tennessee Supreme Court • Decided 1999Enforced
FLAGSHIPDispute ResolutionCited 134 times

HOLDING

Frizzell Construction sued Gatlinburg over unpaid hotel construction work in Tennessee. Gatlinburg countered claiming Frizzell fraudulently misrepresented its ability to complete the project. The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that while the Federal Arbitration Act applies to this interstate construction contract, claims about how the contract was formed—like fraud—can be kept out of arbitration if the parties chose Tennessee law. This means subcontractors can sometimes argue fraud claims belong in court, not arbitration.

KEY FINDINGS

Dispute Resolution

Arbitration clauses don't automatically cover everything—contract formation issues like fraudulent inducement may stay in court even with an arbitration requirement

FULL COURT OPINION