Highland Renovation Corp. v. Hanover Insurance Group

620 F. Supp. 2d 79 | District Court, District of Columbia | 2009

enforcedCited 41 timesBATTLE_TESTEDTexas
View on Court Website

Holding Summary

Highland's Miller Act claim against surety Hanover is barred because Highland failed to file suit within one year of performing its last labor, as punch list and remedial work after July 2006 does not extend the limitations period.

An action brought under the Miller Act must be filed no later than one year after the day on which the last of the labor was performed or material was supplied.

District Court, District of Columbia, 2009

Related Cases

Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.

2013reversed

Forum-selection clauses in federal contracts are enforced through §1404(a) transfer motions, not §1406(a) dismissals, and must be given controlling weight except in exceptional circumstances.

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-Davy

2002voided

Sovereign immunity bars a contractor's breach-of-contract suit against a state agency absent express legislative consent; neither the agency's conduct, contract terms, nor general statutes waive immunity from suit.

Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

2004enforced

A contractor must exhaust administrative remedies established by a regional transportation authority before pursuing breach of contract claims in court, even when the authority lacks governmental immunity from suit.

General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.

2001voided

The State does not waive sovereign immunity from breach-of-contract suits by accepting contract benefits; Chapter 2260's administrative procedure is the exclusive remedy for such claims.

Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase

1992enforced

An arbitrator's decision is generally not reviewable for errors of fact or law, with limited exceptions for fraud, corruption, exceeding powers, or procedural unfairness.

Rory v. Continental Insurance

2005enforced

Unambiguous contractual limitations periods in insurance policies must be enforced as written unless they violate law or public policy; judicial assessments of reasonableness cannot override clear contract terms.