FEDERALDistrict Court, District of Columbia
2009

Highland Renovation Corp. v. Hanover Insurance Group

620 F. Supp. 2d 79District Court, District of Columbia • Decided 2009Enforced
Dispute ResolutionCited 41 times

HOLDING

Highland Renovation performed renovation work on a federal project but was not paid by the general contractor. Highland sued the surety bond company under the Miller Act seeking payment. The court dismissed the case because Highland waited too long to file—more than one year after completing its last work. The court ruled that punch list and remedial work after the main work was done does not restart the one-year deadline to sue.

KEY FINDINGS

Dispute Resolution

File a Miller Act claim within one year of your last day of work—this deadline is strict and cannot be extended by minor follow-up work or punch list items

FULL COURT OPINION