in Re: DeSoto Surgicare Partners, Ltd., Successor-In-Interest to Baylor Surgicare at Duncanville, LLC Texas Health Ventures Group, LLC And United Surgical Partners International, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) | 2015
What This Case Means for Subcontractors
This is a procedural case from the Texas Court of Appeals involving a mandamus petition filed by DeSoto Surgicare Partners and related entities. The court remanded the case back to the lower court without ruling on the underlying contract dispute. The case centered on a motion to strike pleadings and involves lien waiver issues, which are critical for subcontractors seeking payment protection.
Key Takeaways
- •Lien waiver disputes can trigger procedural battles in court before the actual payment disagreement is resolved—budget for legal costs early
- •A remand means the lower court gets another chance to decide; don't assume an appeal will end your case quickly
- •Procedural motions like 'strike pleadings' can delay resolution of payment claims, so ensure your lien waiver language is airtight from the start
Original Proceeding From Cause No. DC-13-02334-L In the 193rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas
Frequently Asked Question
What happens if a court remands my lien waiver case back to the lower court?
A remand means the appeals court sent the case back for the trial court to reconsider or retry the issues. This delays final resolution but gives you another opportunity to present your case. It's not a loss—it's a chance to strengthen your position before a final decision is made.
Related Cases
Green International, Inc. v. Solis
No-damages-for-delay clauses in construction contracts need not meet the conspicuousness requirement established in Dresser for exculpatory negligence clauses, and such clauses are enforceable to bar delay damages absent specific exceptions.
Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
A standard merger clause without clear and unequivocal language expressly disclaiming reliance does not bar a fraud claim, even in a commercial lease agreement between parties.
Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
Sovereign immunity bars subcontractors from enforcing equitable liens against the United States Government, as the APA's waiver of immunity does not extend to claims for money damages.
Weize Co. v. Colorado Regional Construction, Inc.
A general contractor violated Colorado's construction trust fund statute by failing to hold funds in trust for subcontractors and suppliers, and a lien release bond does not exempt contractors from trust fund obligations or excuse failure to record a lis pendens.
PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. Partnership
DTPA claims are not assignable because assignment would defeat the statute's primary purpose of encouraging individual consumers to bring claims themselves, and DTPA claims are too personal and punitive in nature to be transferred as property.
Benchmark Bank v. Crowder
A third party may be subrogated to a federal tax lien and foreclose on a homestead, but must compensate a non-liable spouse for their separate homestead interest.