In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.

166 S.W.3d 732 | Texas Supreme Court | 2005

enforcedCited 998 timesFLAGSHIPTexas
View on Court Website

What This Case Means for Subcontractors

KBR, a second-tier subcontractor, was not a signatory to a contract containing an arbitration clause between MacGregor and Unidynamics. When disputes arose, MacGregor tried to force KBR into arbitration even though KBR never agreed to it. The Texas Supreme Court ruled that KBR cannot be forced to arbitrate claims just because it's part of the subcontracting chain. This protects subcontractors from being dragged into arbitration proceedings they didn't sign up for.

Key Takeaways

  • Non-signatories to arbitration clauses cannot be forced to arbitrate unless they explicitly agreed to be bound by the clause
  • Being a subcontractor in a chain does not automatically make you subject to arbitration clauses in contracts above you
  • Review all contracts you sign directly and understand which disputes you're agreeing to arbitrate—don't assume upstream contracts apply to you

The Act is civil and Fisher received the process due under the Constitutions.

Texas Supreme Court, 2005

Frequently Asked Question

Can my general contractor force me into arbitration if I didn't sign the arbitration clause?

No. Under this Texas case, you cannot be forced to arbitrate unless you personally agreed to the arbitration clause. Simply being a subcontractor in the chain does not bind you to arbitration agreements in contracts you didn't sign. Always review and sign only the contracts you agree to.

Related Cases

Gall v. United States

2007enforced

Appellate courts must review all sentences under an abuse-of-discretion standard regardless of whether they fall inside or outside the Guidelines range, and cannot require extraordinary circumstances to justify sentences outside the range.

Piotrowski v. City of Houston

2001reversed

Municipal liability under § 1983 requires proof of official policy as the moving force; isolated employee misconduct insufficient, and equal protection claim time-barred.

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena

1995remanded

Federal race-based classifications must be analyzed under strict scrutiny regardless of whether they benefit or burden minorities, and the Fifth Amendment's equal protection obligation equals the Fourteenth Amendment's.

Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville

1993remanded

An association of contractors has standing to challenge a minority set-aside ordinance without proving any member would have won a contract absent the ordinance; the injury is denial of equal competitive opportunity, not loss of a specific contract.

Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company

1999reversed

The Fourth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal, holding that the False Claims Act broadly reaches false statements made to obtain government contract approval, not just false payment claims themselves.

Tal v. Hogan

2006enforced

A corporation must be represented by licensed counsel in federal court and cannot appear pro se through its officers; individual shareholders lack standing to assert derivative RICO and antitrust claims.