Rice v. Pinney
51 S.W.3d 705 | Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) | 2001
Holding Summary
A county court has jurisdiction to determine immediate possession in a forcible detainer action even when a concurrent district court suit challenges title, provided the possession determination does not necessarily require resolving the title dispute.
The right to immediate possession can be determined separately from title.
Related Cases
Heldenfels Bros. v. City of Corpus Christi
A municipality owes no duty to a subcontractor to ensure a general contractor provides valid payment bonds, and a subcontractor cannot recover from the municipality under quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, or negligence theories when the general contractor abandons the project.
Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
Sovereign immunity bars subcontractors from enforcing equitable liens against the United States Government, as the APA's waiver of immunity does not extend to claims for money damages.
Weize Co. v. Colorado Regional Construction, Inc.
A general contractor violated Colorado's construction trust fund statute by failing to hold funds in trust for subcontractors and suppliers, and a lien release bond does not exempt contractors from trust fund obligations or excuse failure to record a lis pendens.
Benchmark Bank v. Crowder
A third party may be subrogated to a federal tax lien and foreclose on a homestead, but must compensate a non-liable spouse for their separate homestead interest.
Brown v. Bank of Galveston, National Ass'n
Bank's acts were not the producing cause of Brown's damages and did not violate the DTPA as a matter of law; judgment for Bank affirmed.
CVN Group, Inc. v. Delgado
Parties may arbitrate the validity of mechanic's liens, and arbitration awards determining lien validity must be confirmed unless they clearly violate fundamental public policy.