Sack Lumber Co. v. Goosic
732 N.W.2d 690 | Nebraska Court of Appeals | 2007
Holding Summary
A person receiving only indirect benefit from a transaction can qualify as an accommodation party under the UCC, and Frances was properly determined to be an accommodation party rather than a joint maker of the promissory note.
One receiving only indirect benefit from transaction can qualify as accommodation party.
Related Cases
Green International, Inc. v. Solis
No-damages-for-delay clauses in construction contracts need not meet the conspicuousness requirement established in Dresser for exculpatory negligence clauses, and such clauses are enforceable to bar delay damages absent specific exceptions.
Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
A standard merger clause without clear and unequivocal language expressly disclaiming reliance does not bar a fraud claim, even in a commercial lease agreement between parties.
Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.
Sovereign immunity bars subcontractors from enforcing equitable liens against the United States Government, as the APA's waiver of immunity does not extend to claims for money damages.
Weize Co. v. Colorado Regional Construction, Inc.
A general contractor violated Colorado's construction trust fund statute by failing to hold funds in trust for subcontractors and suppliers, and a lien release bond does not exempt contractors from trust fund obligations or excuse failure to record a lis pendens.
PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. Partnership
DTPA claims are not assignable because assignment would defeat the statute's primary purpose of encouraging individual consumers to bring claims themselves, and DTPA claims are too personal and punitive in nature to be transferred as property.
Benchmark Bank v. Crowder
A third party may be subrogated to a federal tax lien and foreclose on a homestead, but must compensate a non-liable spouse for their separate homestead interest.