Vulcan Materials Co. v. Jack Raus, Inc. (In Re HLW Enterprises of Texas, Inc.)

157 B.R. 592 | United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas | 1993

enforcedCited 17 timesSTANDARDTexas
View on Court Website

Holding Summary

Construction payments held by a contractor create a trust fund for all materialmen and suppliers in the subcontract chain upon initial payment by the owner, and a federal tax lien cannot attach to funds in which the taxpayer has no interest.

Once the owner makes a payment to either the general contractor or to a subcontractor, that payment gives rise to a trust for all parties in the subcontract chain.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, 1993

Related Cases

Green International, Inc. v. Solis

1997modified

No-damages-for-delay clauses in construction contracts need not meet the conspicuousness requirement established in Dresser for exculpatory negligence clauses, and such clauses are enforceable to bar delay damages absent specific exceptions.

Heldenfels Bros. v. City of Corpus Christi

1992enforced

A municipality owes no duty to a subcontractor to ensure a general contractor provides valid payment bonds, and a subcontractor cannot recover from the municipality under quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, or negligence theories when the general contractor abandons the project.

Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.

1999voided

Sovereign immunity bars subcontractors from enforcing equitable liens against the United States Government, as the APA's waiver of immunity does not extend to claims for money damages.

Weize Co. v. Colorado Regional Construction, Inc.

2010affirmed

A general contractor violated Colorado's construction trust fund statute by failing to hold funds in trust for subcontractors and suppliers, and a lien release bond does not exempt contractors from trust fund obligations or excuse failure to record a lis pendens.

Rice v. Pinney

2001enforced

A county court has jurisdiction to determine immediate possession in a forcible detainer action even when a concurrent district court suit challenges title, provided the possession determination does not necessarily require resolving the title dispute.

Benchmark Bank v. Crowder

1996modified

A third party may be subrogated to a federal tax lien and foreclose on a homestead, but must compensate a non-liable spouse for their separate homestead interest.